Theo Papamalamis vs Strong Kirchheimer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Papamalamis vs S. Kirchheimer

Theo Papamalamis

FRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

723

C. Rank

721

595

Best Rank

375

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$8.2K

Plays

Right-Handed

Strong Kirchheimer

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

723

C. Rank

721

595

Best Rank

375

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$8.2K

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Papamalamis 1 - 0 Kirchheimer

They have played 2 sets in total, with Theo Papamalamis winning 2 and Strong Kirchheimer winning 0. The last match between Theo Papamalamis and Strong Kirchheimer was at the M25 Ithaca, 10-01-2025, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Theo Papamalamis getting the victory 6-1 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Papamalamis	1
Kirchheimer	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QF) M25 Ithaca(01-10-25)

Stats

Theo Papamalamis

Strong Kirchheimer

T. Papamalamis vs S. Kirchheimer H2H Profile

T. Papamalamis	Stats	S. Kirchheimer
$0	Career Prize Money	$8,150
51.16% (44-42)	Career Total W/L	53.77% (314-270)
1	Indoor	0
0	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Papamalamis vs S. Kirchheimer Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Theo Papamalamis has won 43.47% of points on their second serve, while Strong Kirchheimer has won 47.94%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Theo Papamalamis, in recent form, has won 42.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Strong Kirchheimer has won 43.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.09% and 26.40% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Theo Papamalamis has saved 58.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Strong Kirchheimer has saved 60.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Theo Papamalamis has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 20/15), with Strong Kirchheimer winning 37.93% (W/L 22/36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Theo Papamalamis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 17/13), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 8/9). Strong Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 74/61), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 175/153).
Player level: In the last year, Theo Papamalamis has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.00% of matches (W/L 13/7), where as Strong Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 35.48% of matches (W/L 11/20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Theo Papamalamis winning 1 times and Strong Kirchheimer being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Theo Papamalamis winning 2 and Strong Kirchheimer winning 0.
The last match between Theo Papamalamis and Strong Kirchheimer was at the M25 Ithaca, 10-01-2025, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Theo Papamalamis getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:49.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Theo Papamalamis has played against opponents with an average rank of 370.97 while Strong Kirchheimer has played against players with an average rank of 400.17.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Theo Papamalamis has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Strong Kirchheimer has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Theo Papamalamis has converted 38.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Strong Kirchheimer has converted 32.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Theo Papamalamis vs Strong Kirchheimer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Papamalamis vs S. Kirchheimer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Papamalamis	Stats	S. Kirchheimer
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	3
3	Aces (Total)	2
1	Total Double Faults	0
1:17:49	Average Match Time	1:17:49
53% (24/45)	1st Serve %	77% (33/43)
83% (20/24)	1st Serve Win %	45% (15/33)
67% (14/21)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (5/10)
100% (4/4)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/0)
53% (23/43)	Return Points Win %	24% (11/45)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Papamalamis Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Las Vegas Challenger - 22-09-2025
R1 Moerani BouzigeM. Bouzige	L	3-6 4-1 ret.	Stats
Columbus Challenger - 15-09-2025
R1 Justin BoulaisJ. Boulais	L	6-1 7-5	Stats
Winston-Salem Challenger - 08-09-2025
Q3 Quinn VandecasteeleQ. Vandecasteele	L	7-5 7-6(2)	Stats
Q1 Roger Pascual FerraR. Pascual	W	7-5 6-3	Stats
M15 Monastir - 25-08-2025
R1 Markus MolderM. Molder	L	7-6(2) 6-4	Stats

View All

S. Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Temuco Challenger - 24-11-2025
R1 Daniel Dutra Da SilvaD. Dutra	W	7-6(3) 6-2	Stats
Drummondville Challenger - 10-11-2025
Q3 Jangjun KimJ. Kim	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Q1 Benjamin Thomas GeorgeB. Thomas	W	6-1 1-6 7-6(5)	Stats
Knoxville Challenger - 03-11-2025
Q1 Peter MakkP. Makk	L	7-6(5) 6-3	Stats
Charlottesville Challenger - 27-10-2025
Q1 Dhakshineswar SureshD. Suresh	L	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

T. Papamalamis vs S. Kirchheimer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Papamalamis	Stats	S. Kirchheimer
51.16% (44/42)	YTD Win/Loss	53.77% (314/270)
51.58% (98/92)	Sets Win/Loss	54.11% (730/619)
50.70% (906/881)	Games Win/Loss	52.15% (6656/6108)
47.06% (8/9)	Hard Win/Loss	53.35% (175/153)
56.67% (17/13)	Clay Win/Loss	54.81% (74/61)
48.72% (19/20)	Indoor Hard W/L	53.72% (65/56)
0.27	Aces Per Game	0.32
238	Aces Total	2025
0.17	Double Faults Per Game	0.17
146	Total Double Faults	1071
1:51:26	Average Match Time	1:28:4
411.6	Average Opponent Rank	465.92
58% (3366/5826)	1st Serve %	64% (21226/33011)
66% (2220/3366)	1st Serve Win %	69% (14625/21226)
50% (1226/2460)	2nd Serve Win %	52% (6100/11785)
42% (253/600)	Break Points Won % (Total)	39% (1253/3187)
41% (2331/5689)	Return Points Win %	39% (12948/33623)
0.00% (0/1)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/2)	Main Tour W/L	40.00% (4/6)
46.67% (7/8)	Challenger W/L	43.81% (92/118)
55.22% (37/30)	Futures W/L	59.89% (218/146)
51% (41/81)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (310/575)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	25% (1/4)
44% (11/25)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	49% (83/170)
43% (10/23)	Deciding Set Win %	44% (80/182)
81% (47/38)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (330/272)
15% (47/7)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (330/57)
15% (39/6)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (254/42)